 |
Protests rise up in Haiti. Motion is there, since the country is clearly not standing still. However, Milien raises the issue of convergence, asking what shared horizon Haiti is moving toward. A cadence is missing, which in turn stops multiple movements or groups from going toward the same moral horizon. In this way, Milien's book argues that Haiti's impasse comes from a failure to converge, as well as a lack of power or will. This state of motion without direction continues to cancel out uncoordinated efforts. Eight parts of the book examine different social groups as moral actors, constrained by structure and shaped by history, but ultimately responsible for what they choose to do. For example, "Part IV: Love from a Distance" discusses whether Haiti can be rebuilt by those who no longer experience its daily risks. "Part VII: Divided Memory, Divided Future" travels back in time to ask if a nation can progress when its people remember the past differently. Milien aims to restore purpose where repetition has been understood as resistance.
Milien was born in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, and attended two Haitian universities before moving to the United States. In his academic career, his theses focused on topics related to his birth country. He wrote about the press' position in Haitian social life, Haitian Mormon converts living in New York City, and democracy and human rights in Haiti, among other topics. His bachelor's degrees in civil engineering and mass communications, along with master's degrees in sociology, international relations and public administration, and education, give him a multidisciplinary academic background for this work. For those interested in political philosophy, moral sociology, Caribbean studies, civic theory, or related fields, this book offers up questions for further thought and study. In this book, Milien notes that modern analyses often stop at examining power, so he explores it through questions of responsibility, legitimacy, obligation, and sustainability.
This academic perspective is central to the work. The eight parts make up what Milien calls a thematic map of a society in motion without direction. Having this thematic map is a great starting point for students, researchers, and faculty members to mark out what they'd like to study in more depth or ask questions about. Milien recommends this book as a companion to Politics, Gangs, and Vodou, part of the same moral universe. What works well is how this current work suggests looking inward. It's asking for a deeper understanding of consciousness, moral orientation, collective memory, identity, and breakdowns in coordination. It also notes the fractures in a people's sense of shared purpose that arise from these issues. Rather than just mapping what happened, this book highlights the unsettling absence of rhythm. For those who want to go beyond simply finding who or what to blame, one can move forward to looking at responsibility without cruelty, a judgment that's not condemning hurriedly or excusing very lightly. After finishing this book, readers might feel motivated to push for moral education, media responsibility, and even civic imagination. The ultimate goal isn't being the loudest person or crowd but moving in a common direction, with the same horizon ahead.